Sanism, ‘Mental Health’, and Social Work/Education: A Review and Call to Action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48336/IJDBHR4913Keywords:
mental health, sanism, Mad studies, oppression, rights, social work, social work educationAbstract
Sanism is a devastating form of oppression, often leading to negative stereotyping or arguments that individuals with ‘mental health’ histories are not fit to study social work. However, the term sanism is rarely used, understood, or interrogated in the social work academy, even in anti-oppressive spaces. Indeed, social work has been so loyal to the medical model that sanist aggressions, such as pathologizing, labelling, exclusion, and dismissal have become a ‘normal’ part of professional practice and education. We query the moral integrity of a profession that at its foundational core could play a role in such a discriminatory tactic as sanism. We wonder what the effect of this has been on social work and its education. We ask, who has been excluded, what has been silenced or denied because of the privileging of medical conceptualizations of madness, and how can we work toward anti-sanist social work today? In this paper we provide an overview of sanism. We offer a more critical review of the literature on ‘mental health’ and social work. We report on our anti-sanist participatory pilot research, and aligned with current Canadian rights work, we call for action with respect to how social workers theorize, research, and respond to madness now.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in Intersectionalities are open access and licensed under a creative commons license (CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0). Please consult the license for the terms of use.
Copyright for all article content remains with the authors.
The journal is published by Memorial University on the Open Journals System (OJS).